Reserved Māori Council Positions on New Zealand Local Governments to Be Slashed by More Than Half
The number of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be cut by more than half, after a divisive law change that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.
Historical Context on Māori Wards
Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more elected officials depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their area. Communities frequently devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their councils to establish Indigenous representation.
Legislative Shifts and Government Actions
To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.
However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating local residents should decide whether to establish Māori wards.
Voting Outcomes
The new legislation mandated councils that had established a ward under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.
These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”
Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it aims to end “race-based” policies, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.
Urban-Rural Divide
The results of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.
“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”
Voter Turnout and Criticism
The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters participating, prompting demands for reform.
The process had been “a mockery”.
Differential Standards
Councils are able to establish different wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.
“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”
This statement concerned the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.